Lawrence O'Donnell Goes Wild On McLaughlin Group
Sat Feb 11, 2006 at 04:39:23 PM PDT
Lawrence O'Donnell returned to the McLaughlin Group and was absolutely on fire. It was awesome to behold.
More below the cut.
Could NSA be cover for Alito?
Thu Jan 26, 2006 at 05:14:15 AM PDT
In this era of Machiavellian politics run rampant, it is easy to get paranoid. But as they say, if you're not paranoid, you aren't paying enough attention.
Having just read this article, I am starting to wonder:
One aide said part of the problem is that Democratic senators haven't felt a groundswell of opposition from constituents. Polls show that Alito's nomination is supported by most Americans.
"People aren't engaged in this fight," one senior aide said. "The reality is this isn't something that American people are calling in droves about. We're getting more calls in on NSA spying than we are on Alito."
More on the flip...
Democrat Guilt on Iraq...
Tue Nov 29, 2005 at 10:39:09 AM PDT
A friend of mind sent me two articles from Counterpunch, both of which basically say that Democrats, including Howard Dean and President Clinton, are just as guilty as Bush on Iraq and that consequently all issues about the "lying us into war" are specious.
These are posted below...you decide.
Bush's Bro, Kilgore-VA, & Illegal Dumping...
Wed Oct 12, 2005 at 06:49:04 PM PDT
The latest Rolling Stone (print only as far as I can tell) has a sidebar article about Marvin Bush's role in massive illegal waste dumping in VA, aided and abetted by none other than Jerry Kilgore, the right wing whack job running for governor.
Highlights from the article below the fold.
Bush was "eminently beatable"--BULLSHIT!
Tue Oct 11, 2005 at 03:32:33 PM PDT
I got so pissed reading Kos's diatribe against Kerry, I had to post my reply separately. I am really fucking tired of tearing down our champions after they fail to achieve the nearly impossible. We are our own worse enemies.
My post is below the flip.
Seize "The Culture of Life"...
Sun Sep 11, 2005 at 08:15:35 AM PDT
Apologies in advance for other diaries this may echo.
I was listening to interview on Russert with a guy who wrote a book about the 1927 floods and the seismic shift in attitudes about the role of government when it hit me.
Now is the time for us to seize, and completely redefine, "the culture of life" and use it as the anchor of OUR vision for the future. Reframe!
More below the fold...
New site: TruthAboutKatrina.com
Fri Sep 09, 2005 at 04:51:41 AM PDT
I got this from a friend of mine, it is something one of his clients put together:
Shortly after the immensity of the Katrina disaster became clear last week, I began worrying about what the Bush Administration would do to avoid accountability. I worried not so much about the short term politics involved, but rather that the GOP's spin control would prevent policy changes that are so badly needed.
Hoping to provide a resource for counter-spin, I put together a new website project called www.TruthAboutKatrina.com. This website aims to educate visitors about the failures of politics and ideology that led to the catastrophe, and also to serve as a resource for progressive activists and organizations by providing updated links and information about the federal government's failure.
FEMA: Back to the "good old days"
Fri Sep 02, 2005 at 06:38:14 AM PDT
FEMA under Bush 1 was a disaster in itself. In the wake of Hurricane Andrew (which occurred during GHWB's term in Aug 92 and was comparable in scale and devastation to Katrina), FEMA was
"reborn", largely due to the efforts of Clinton and the Democrats in Congress.
However under Dim Son, FEMA has once again reverted to its incompetent, ineffective self.
Do some research on Hurricane Andrew, and it will remind you that NOLA is not the first time devastation on this scale has occurred here, and that the response at the time was comparably inept--and the key similarity was a Republican government that didn't give a shit about the American people.
Bush the Wimp -- A glimpse of the true man
Tue Aug 30, 2005 at 07:00:59 AM PDT
From the
article referenced in today's
C&J:
When he went biking with Lance Armstrong in Crawford earlier this month, the two, at one point, approached a particularly steep and rocky hill. Bush "wouldn't even contemplate going up it," recalls a senior Bush official. For his part, Armstrong cruised up the incline. A White House military aide made it part of the way up but "Lance just buried him" and Bush was in awe of his stamina.
For Bush it is better to never try than to risk failing and be subject to humiliation. This is in line with his inability to admit making errors. It's all about avoiding the humiliation.
Contrast with this:
...we have seen him show up for an 85-mile charity bike ride in a cold, driving rain and finish it, long after the celebrity riders had dropped out.
Now THAT is character.
NARAL Screws up, bigtime...
Thu Aug 11, 2005 at 04:40:51 PM PDT
Just watching Hardball, and NARAL cancelled on a segment to debate the accuracy of their ad on John Roberts. Instead some woman from the National Abortion Federation (great name, that) had to stand in and defend the ad, while Repiglican shill and Bushevite legal hack Ben Ginsberg was lobbed softballs.
Boy, THAT was a politically savvy move by NARAL. One in a string, it seems.
Why I don't support NARAL or other Single Issue Groups...
Tue Aug 09, 2005 at 04:02:02 PM PDT
I used to. I used to support lots of them. One by one, I have cut them all off. Here's why.
Roberts = Payback for 2000 Election Theft...
Wed Jul 20, 2005 at 07:35:26 PM PDT
How are John Bolton and John Roberts alike? The answer lies below the fold...
The best way to sell democracy...
Sun Jul 17, 2005 at 09:23:25 AM PDT
Is to bring about the fall of the Bush administration. Why do I say that?
The Limits of American Power....
Thu Jun 23, 2005 at 01:11:58 PM PDT
With us sinking deeper and deeper into The Quagmire that is Iraq, it is becoming increasingly obvious that this exercise, far from demonstrating our strength and fearsomeness to the rest of the world, has instead demonstrate the limits of American power. How has this happened and what are the implications?
Budget Fails Test of Christian Morality
Tue May 17, 2005 at 03:18:15 PM PDT
My mom, an embattled liberal who retired to Chapel Hill NC sent me this:
"Robert Seymour, pastor emeritus of Binkley Baptist Church in Chapel Hill, NC wrote the following for 'Village Voices' on 5/9/2005:"
Budget fails test of morality
Few things are quite so revealing of the values people hold than a look at their canceled checks. The same thing can be said about the budget of the federal government. It is a moral document for it reveals what we value most.
For example, in the faith tradition of every major world religion, a primary value is placed upon taking care of the poor; but the new budget presented to Congress shows a dramatic difference between what this administration says and what it does.
More below the fold...
The REAL motive behind Social Security privatization...
Sun May 15, 2005 at 10:09:52 AM PDT
This analysis has been brewing in the back of my mind for a while, and finally surfaced fully formed while I was shredding reports on my 401K for last year.
A number of rationales have been provided for SS privatization: the funding crunch, the "ownership society", better rates of return, etc. Also it has been described as "welfare for Wall Street". But none of these address what would be really going on and who the real beneficiaries would be...
WaPo Today Has Op-Ed By FRC Tony Perkins!!!
Sat May 14, 2005 at 06:47:33 AM PDT
In an all too unfortunate example of allowing the insane to gain access to the public forum, we get
this:
Well, I agree with the president that some Democratic senators have targeted the judicial philosophy of the nominees. But that judicial philosophy has been scrutinized and scorned in several cases precisely because of the nominee's belief system or faith -- not because of his or her record. After all, it was Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) -- not the Family Research Council -- who launched an inquiry into one key nominee's "deeply held personal beliefs." Schumer didn't challenge the nominee's "deeply held judicial philosophy," but rather his beliefs.
Of course it is precisely NOT because of those beliefs per se, but because those beliefs are translated into judicial activism of the worst kind, that these candidates are being opposed by everyone but the so-called "religious" right and their corporatist and neo-con allies.
Smoking gun memo: Impeachable Offense
Wed May 04, 2005 at 03:47:23 PM PDT
Greg Palast has a blazing
editorial in Buzzflash concerning the memo published in the Times that blows the lid off what we all already knew:
The top-level government memo marked "SECRET AND STRICTLY PERSONAL," dated eight months before Bush sent us into Iraq, following a closed meeting with the President, reads, "Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam through military action justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WDM. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy." [Emphasis added]
So what kind of play is this getting overseas?